Really don't take this the wrong way, but...

I feel like an ass writing this, but it’s stuck on my mind.

Is Erle Montaigue crazy? Now, I’ve never met him, and I’ve heard mostly good things about him, and he seems to know what he’s doing on his tapes.

However, this is concerning his “Old Yang Form.” He says it was the original form, and Yang Chen-fu changed it to the lesser active version. In other words, he took out all the fa-jing movements etc. I don’t have to explain here, because you guys all know the story.

But essentially, Erle seems to be the only one who knows this form (as far as I know, maybe there’s big group of Old Yang style people somewhere I don’t know about). Now, normally, assuming the person is of good credibility, which Erle seems to be, I would think “Cool, he must have been taught an uncommon form by some old taiji master.” However, the following information is suspect (bolded is important, italics are my comments):

From his downloadable book on the Old Style, luchanbook.pdf:

“Those who were unfamiliar with it and who were perhaps a little jealous that this blue eyed westerner was perhaps one of the only people in modern history to have received such information, said that perhaps Erle Montaigue simply invented this form.”

no problem yet. I can see how people could be jealous, can’t you?

"Some even went to great lengths to find others who had trained with me many years back to try and gain fuel for this fire such was their evil intent!
This did not worry me and I was in a way slightly flattered to
think that such people should think that I was of such genius to
have invented such a perfect form of self-defense and self
healing.
"

Now, there’s nothing wrong with this per se, but the way he phrases it makes it kind of sound like he’s deferring illusions of grandeur to downplay himself in other’s eyes while he himself takes comfort in having invented (made up) a form that he will convince everyone else is so “perfect.”

However, as much as I would like to think that I
invented this form,

Eh? I can’t help but wonder why he would “like to think he invented” it?

“nowadays new information has come to
light with others producing books with very old Chinese
masters performing what amounts to the Old Yang Style.”

“what amounts to,” eh?

However, it does not really matter who invented this form, my
self,…

really…

"…Yang Lu-ch’an or my teacher, Chang Yiu-chun,

here he’s saying it doesn’ t matter, attempting to take people’s minds off the fact that he could have made it up himself.

“the fact remains that whoever learns this form or even sees it performed looks on in awe at such a beautifully powerful and ‘still’ set of…”

Alright. I’m not trying to píss people off here or anything, so I don’t want “stop questioning my teacher’s authenticity!” as a reply. I just want to hear other people’s opinions.

As far as my experience, Erle has been nothing but extremely helpful and polite anytime I emailed him, and never tried to force me to buy anything from him, unlike some other people ::coughjameslacycough::

So, I’m not trying to discredit Erle. I’m trying to get some opinions on what I’ve pointed out because I don’t know what to make of it myself.

And also, I don’t want to bother learning the old Yang form if it’s not “real.”

Note: There was something somewhere else on his site where he made refrence to the same thing (ie. “I could have made up this form.”) but seriously I cannot find it again. If I do find it I’ll post it.

btw the text I quoted is on pages 1 and 2 (book page numbers, not adobe acrobat pages) of chapter 1.

Iron

If anyone’s claiming to do the same stuff as Yang Lu Chan, they’re either full of it, or carrying on a dead tradition. It’s 200 years later, living traditions evolve.

So are you saying the reason no one does the old form anymore is because it died out because it wasn’t effective? …and no longer a living tradition? So it’s not worth learning?

Iron

Not very many people can live up to Yang Luchan these days. I would be pretty proud to know I was doing the same forms and training methods as him.

Originally posted by IronFist
[B]So are you saying the reason no one does the old form anymore is because it died out because it wasn’t effective? …and no longer a living tradition? So it’s not worth learning?

Iron [/B]

No. You misunderstood. Arts change through time. They evolve. What works for you may not work for me and Vice Versa. Our stuff shouldn’t look exactly the same, even if we study under the same teacher. Now, add 200 years into that equation.

I’m not getting the same things from those quotes you are; I guess it’s a matter of interpretation. All he’s really saying is, “look I got this form that I was told is old style, I don’t think it really matters how old it is, I just think it’s pretty good, alot of people say I made it up - how flattering that they think I’m able to invent something this good, and besides now they’re learning about alot of other unrelated people doing similar stuff to me.” What’s wrong with that? Not to say that Erle hasn’t said some ‘remarkable’ things to market his stuff - he has. I just don’t see what the outrage is from those quotes. BTW - there ARE unrelated people doing essentially identical forms to him.

I my self don’t have any problem with Mr. Montague or any of his students that post here.

Most posting that I have read from them really show a dedicated sincere group of people promoting / defending their views of IMA. Mr. Montague must be a good teacher to attract and have such people represent him.

For TC we can all say the what was written by the past masters “classics” should be very definitive of what is and what is not. Each of us follows a way suited to their understandings and inclinations of these words.

The problem or disagreement that I would have is by the use of terms such as org. or true or any other exclusive term that tends to promote what appears to be a narrow viewpoint based on ours is better or more real. Even then I would say it’s more of an understanding then something absolute.

Most people say they come here to expand and learn from each other.

is it still? :wink:

Oh, and for the record:

I’m not claiming E.M. is a phoney, or that he doesn’t teach a lineage of Taiji that is different than what was taught through Yang Chen Fu. I’m just saying that I’d bet money that it’s not the same thing Yang Lu Chan was doing.

I’m not directing this towards any posts in this thread, but sometimes it seems that people on this and other forums divide teachers of their style into two categories:

  1. My teacher/lineage
    vs.
  2. ignorant, conniving frauds.

It seems to me there’s a lot of middle ground in there. I may not agree with every point or emphasis of EM, but from reading some of his stuff and reading Sam’s posts for quite a while, I would conclude that he’s very knowledgeable about Taiji.

As far as whether or not his form is Yang Lu Chan’s original form—I would have to say I agree completely with what Water Dragon said.

My definition of “real” Taiji is someone who deeply understands the principles and training methods, and is able to manifest them via punching, kicking, throwing, chin na, qigong and weapons.

Bamboo - Erle’s and his students’ ‘dedication’ :wink: to their lineage is certainly no more remarkable than that shown almost universally in the internal arts. Not that that makes it any more acceptable, but it certainly means he shouldn’t be singled out regarding it.

Whether or not you like Erle’s taiji, he’s a great guy. I’ve e-mailed him questions before and he is very prompt and helpful in his reply. On one occasion I was buying a video from him, and he just threw in another free video (which was especially nice since they cost a fortune).

I’ve disagreed with his version of taiji history before, but that doesn’t mean he’s crazy.

I’m currently learning an Old Yang Family form (different from Erle’s) that was passed down to only one disciple every generation (until now, otherwise why would I been learning it?), the lineage being: Yang Lu Chan of course, then Yang Jian Hou his son, then Zhang Qin Lin who was a regular student of Cheng Fu’s but became a disciple of Jian Hou, then Wang Yen-Nian who is now 88, to my teacher. I believe it is authentic, and it works. I’m not saying my teacher’s form is EXACTLY what Yang Lu Chan did, but because there are only 3 generations between Lu Chan and my teacher, it leaves less room for watering down.

Does that make me crazy? I certainly hope not.

Old Form this, Old Form that.

Nobody alive was around when YLC was teaching, so nobody knows what he really did.

YLC only did verbal transmissions as he could not write.

So there will be lots of different versions of his old Form out there, IMHO.

Yes, and time, practicioners, changes played a role in that.
YCF did his Forms differently as a youth than as an old man.

What is authentic, nobody can tell and nobody got any real proof.

So where does that leave Erle. to be honest nowhere.

Look at his form execution, postures,etc do the follow the Tai Chi principles and rules.

If it does it is a valid Tai Chi Form, regardless of what it is called or who created it.

If you wanna learn it make sure that he can transmit it well.

If not don’t care about it either way.
Just some thoughts.

lol I’m surprised Sam Wiley hasn’t decided to defend his ‘sifu’. anyways it’s high uncommon that he would learn it but thinking he invented it is a LITTLE ****y. the only thing that bothers me is that i visited his site and if he really does have a good reputation he seems to publicize how he’ll never try using fa jing on someone again and all that.

i guess it’s maybe because i haven’t seen besides in his bad broad sword form or what he calls a ‘knife’, but his articles seem to protect him in that you can’t really test him because he’s claimed to have knocked this guy dead and sent this guy to a hospital and so on. heh I was just wondering who else here represents him because so far I’ve only seem Sam Wiley and this garry rommel guy who owns

www.pressurepointfighting.com

then again this may be just that bad broad sword video that soured my opinion of him :p. I have no problem with the fact that some westerner knows a 200 year old form. and i don’t think yang lu chan made it any less active. if he slowed it down why are tai chi masters still powerful today? many practise the yang style. it’s not just the form that makes it up. there’s lots of philosophy behind it and it’s based on the original 13 postures. tai chi forms all have the 13 postures in some form or another so in essence how can you lose?

Lets not forget that the Inventor of the 108 Form was:

Yang Chen Fu.

When asked why he created such a long form his reply was as follows:

“My Students I know you are lazy If I tell you do a Form 3 times you will do it 3 times, regardles of it’S length.
So for your benefit I created along Form”.
P.S.: Prior to YCF there was only Tai Chi Chuan, no Family names was attached then.

Seeya.

also 108 is an IMPORTANT TAOIST NUMBER!!!

i can’t remember but 108 is the total number of dieties or a combo of some type of gods in taoism.

What’s EM’s site address?

I doubt that you’re going to get any closer to the original form than the one Erle practices. In my opinion, going any further back on the time line goes to the Chen style forms and the Wudang forms, as those are Yang’s influences. I agree that over the years things have been changed about the form, as different teachers placed emphasis on different things, and even Erle practices the form differently now than he did several years ago. But barring slight variations between practitioners, the form itself has not changed.

Now, having said that, can I prove that this is the same form as Yang’s original? Nope. Can I prove Erle didn’t invent it himself? Nope. Do I care? Nope. People are free to ignore him and what he says and teaches if they want. For some reason, though, people can’t leave the subject of Erle Montaigue alone. His detractors, no matter how insignificant they claim his stuff is, will argue until they turn blue in the face telling people how much of a fake he’s supposed to be, how he’s supposedly defrauding everyone, how his stuff is made up and his fa-jing is not real…but they can neither show who is the real deal, nor can they show the real stuff themselves. And to top it all off, they usually spout their abusive tripe from behind a mask of anonymity and a wall of half-truths, misquotes, and out-of-context statements. They cannot support their claims that Erle is a fraud, and in addition are themselves purposely misleading others in their attempt to downtread Erle.

Erle on the other hand, doesn’t have anything in writing or any pictures or anything else that might prove he’s telling the truth. So he just keeps teaching in the hope that those who recognize the value of what he’s teaching will take what they want. And because of the relentless assault of his detractors, he has pretty much given up on trying to prove anything. He just says what he has to say and leaves it at that. And I don’t blame him.

So anyway, that’s why he wrote what he did.

the form isn’t everything. people may not be able to do it but if you are going to display yourself especially as a MASTER WESTERNER who got invited to the 1985 CHINA games i don’t see how it’s NOT questionable. Of course there’s the possibility of i t happening but if he’s that unfit then you can isntantly tell. if his fa-jing video on his site was what his fa-jin was 5-10 years ago then how’d he get rank of master in the first place? it’s not smooth at all. And seeing as how you live in Georgia i don’t see how you would spend 1500-2000 on a plane ticket to visit Erle regularly and continue your training unless you were some rich person.

tai chi masters are graceful. being able to do the old form isn’t that important. you still develop it and it wasn’t the form that made Yang Lu Chan great. it was the depth of his understanding of tai chi and that’s more important than knowing a 200 year old form. Some people can do fancy flash kicks but if they don’t understand it they’ll never use it in a fight.

Oh Boy, Here we go…

The old Yang style form that Erle teaches bears striking resemblance to the 99-step Synthesized form of Chen Pan Ling. Could there be a connection here?

Personally I have seen a modified version of the 99-step form as taught by Wang Shu Jin’s lineage and it also looks similar to Erle’s form, aside from some of the changes that has been made by Wang.

Just a thought.

KG