um…
Ok. Well I was done but if we are going to be nickpicky(if I can make up that word). I chose the word “states” in the literal sense because it was stated in said book but I also chose to use the word “theories” afterward to illustrate that neither is fact but merely suggestion. Afterall, a theory is just that. It simply suggests something but in no way proves it. If it did we would be discussing it as fact. On the same subject, a statement is merely something that is said. Anything(including that which I am typing now)can be considered, and is, a statement. I in no way stated that any of this is pure fact nor did I state that SL Fung said that it was. Once again, he stated a theory of his(which is a suggestion and not fact) and I commented on said theory due to my issue with it.
In regards to the HB Un portion of my post, I have already addressed it and am getting the book back from my sifu to re read(the advice given by yourself) so that I may educate myself a bit better.
I do however await more Bak Mei discussions that have to do with training in said style and not the politics that corrupt it.
This one’s done.
Let it go.
–peace
[QUOTE=ittokaos;945847]Ok. Well I was done but if we are going to be nickpicky(if I can make up that word). I chose the word “states” in the literal sense because it was stated in said book but I also chose to use the word “theories” afterward to illustrate that neither is fact but merely suggestion. Afterall, a theory is just that. It simply suggests something but in no way proves it. If it did we would be discussing it as fact. On the same subject, a statement is merely something that is said. Anything(including that which I am typing now)can be considered, and is, a statement. I in no way stated that any of this is pure fact nor did I state that SL Fung said that it was. Once again, he stated a theory of his(which is a suggestion and not fact) and I commented on said theory due to my issue with it.
In regards to the HB Un portion of my post, I have already addressed it and am getting the book back from my sifu to re read(the advice given by yourself) so that I may educate myself a bit better.
I do however await more Bak Mei discussions that have to do with training in said style and not the politics that corrupt it.
This one’s done.
Let it go.
–peace[/QUOTE]
Edit :
Well, I typed a long and winding answer, but having thought the more about it, I say only this :
You (ittokaos) train in a martial art that is called Foshan Pak Mei.
This martial art has nothing whatsoever to do in any way shape or form save for the words Pak Mei , with Cheung Lai Chuen Pak Mei.
That is it.
No politics here.
Therefore I, for one, can’t see how I can really discuss Pak Mei training with you because I practice the latter and not the former and vice versa applies for you.
It’s done now. 