[QUOTE=mickey;1148706]Hi,
I would not call you an ass-- not even on a bad day.
I am aware of the difference between brucella and an amoebe.
You misquoted me with “insidious cover-up”
And I do not believe everyone is on the same page when it comes to corexit. When the oil spill hit, the news media used the words “oil dispersant” without ever mentioning anything about toxicity nor long term ramificaions concerning its use.
To answer ground water contamination by way of rain. Dispersant washed along the shore line. I really think that we are just beginning to see its effects. Time will tell with this. I hope you are right because this is something I want very much to be wrong about.
Still, I am taking the necessary precautions with seafood. My family and I are avoiding it.
Oh my gosh!!
I know what you are,SoCo KungFu. You are one of those agents who surveillance threads for stuff like this. I have been waiting for you and you will not succeed. 
mickey[/QUOTE]
Ummm…no I didn’t.
I feel that this “Neti pot” nonsense is more of a cover for something more insidious that concerns the after effects of the use of Corexit.
You post that in a thread attempting to draw a correlation between the two incidents and make that statement. There isn’t a whole lot of room for interpretation.
Not sure what you’re getting at. It was all over the place people were asking what the potential hazards were in the employment of corexit.
Even BP admitted it was toxic. Everyone knew it was toxic. EPA reports even listed is as 10 to 20 times as toxic as other possible options.
Now if you want to levy a complaint on why those other options were not employed, fine. If you want to complain about why they weren’t even really produced in a quantity needed to actually be employed, fine. If you want to complain about Nalco’s ties with the oil industry, fine. If you want to question why BP was still throwing it out into the water after EPA ordered a halt to its use, fine.
But no where in there is there reason to make an illogical leap like the one you posted originally. Not even the same offending organism. And while we’re at it, Naegleria fowleri, is a FRESHWATER microorganism. It can’t even survive salt water.
Now, you don’t want to eat the fish. Great. I agree with you. Why? Because corexit binds to and breaks down oil and emulsifying it. Ie. With corexit, oil and water DO mix. That gets suspended into the water column and taken into the marine population. So yeah, the fish is contaminated and how much right now we can’t say.
But again, that has nothing to do with a proven safe sinus treatment. A couple morons didn’t boil their water. That’s all.
Methyl salicylate is toxic too. Are we going to say that Listerine is in cahoots with chemical weapons development?