Not much of a surprise, I guess, but…
From Yahoo!
No KO, but Tyson Win
Mike Tyson needed six rounds Saturday before stopping Brian Nielsen, the longest fight the former heavyweight champion has had since losing to Evander Holyfield five years ago. Tyson bloodied the Dane in the second round and knocked him down in the third. But Nielsen fought gamely until the referee finally ended the fight because of his swollen left eye.
Damn, and I bet on Neilson…
"Just because I joke around sometimes doesn’t mean I’m serious about kung-fu.
" - nightair
Yes I knew it!!! 
Do you guys think tyson could get back to the way he used to be?
IXIJoe KaveyIXI
I am Sharky’s main man…
“Do you guys think tyson could get back to the way he used to be?”
I don’t think he could be that good again, but I think he’s good enough to win back the title.
How good was that white dude in that pic?
IXIJoe KaveyIXI
I am Sharky’s main man…
He had the best record in the heavyweight division.
Thanks…
IXIJoe KaveyIXI
I am Sharky’s main man…
Nielsen…not nielson ******
How many of the fights was sent on tv? from what i saw i think they started sending the fights very late, so did you guys see for instance Kessler Vs Medez, or Calzaghe Vs Mc Intyre?
those fights were good, Tyson Vs Nielsen was more a question of how long Brian could hold on.
They said that he was unable to see with one of his eyes, so i understand why he quitted.
heh i loved the danish commentator
“löööööövehjerte!!”
Free thinkers are dangerous!
why would he say “løvehjerte”? weird..
anyway, did the people here on the forums who saw the fight have to pay to see it, like here in denmark? or else, i’m gonna be PISSED OFF! :mad:
heh of course they have to pay, here in Iceland there’s a station that handles all boxing matches it costs around 30$ a month (has all sorts of sporting events in that package). In USA i’m guessing it’s on PPV, and that’s propably around 20-30$ for only the tyson show.
Free thinkers are dangerous!
Isnt it Damgård whos is called løvehjerte?
Nemo is always first with the scores. Which means he must have a TV set in each room and twenty VCR’s or he just plain never leaves the house. Ah!, To be young with no worries, I miss your age. Enjoy it while you have it.
Are you immortal?
sifuabel@yahoo.
com
Mr. Nemo is third with results from Hopkins v. Trinidad! haha
I don’t think tyson will ever be as good as he was, and I don’t think he will win back the title. If he fights Lewis, lewis will handle him easily - like he did with Holyfield who beat tyson.
There’s some good boxers in heavyweight that could take tyson no problem.
That’s what I thought until Rahman showed us that Lennox can be beaten. I think Tyson could take Lennox now, but if Rahman keeps the title that fight may never happen.
Lennox, Rahman, and Klitchko(sp?) could all concievably beat Tyson, but Tyson could also concievably beat them.
Just backing up the Lewis comment above.
JWT
If you pr!ck us, do we not bleed? If you poison us, do we not die? And if you wrong us, shall we not revenge? If we are like you in the rest, we will resemble you in that the villany you teach me, I will execute, and it shall go hard but I will better the instruction. MOV
Rahman sucks
It’s true. Yes I might eat my words, but I doubt it. Would you have gone on about how great Buster Douglas was after he KO’D Tyson? Of course not, Douglas was mediocre at best - so is Rahman - he got lucky, just like Douglas. Lewis will be prepared (I know, I know, he should have in the first place), and will handle Rahman easily. THis guy is getting way too much credit if you ask me. I’ll give you Klitchko (haha sp. with me too) though. Him and Lewis I think could easily beat Tyson.
Rahman does not suck.
It’s true Lewis was unprepared, and that played a part in his loss, but it didn’t play the entirety of it. If he’d been KO’d in the 10th, you could say he was out of shape, but when you get KO’d in the 5th, it means you have a weakness as a fighter, which Rahman exploited.
If I were a betting man, I’d put my money on Rahman for the rematch. A lot of guys instantly get better when they win the title, I think that’ll be the case with him. I think Rahman has a 60% chance of winning, Lewis 40%.
i agree that rahman does not suck.
he is strong and quick, and a slick boxer. but people look at the body of a boxer, and how crisp are his movment, which rahman has a “weakness” (which mean nothing). thats like saying butterbean sucks, he doesnt he was quick, he hit hard, and he has accuracy, but people look at his body and the wet noodles he fights.
rahman saw enough action that he can give a good fight to anyone, and he got one more thing, and that is courage. show me a fighter that you cannot intimidate, and i will show you a long fight you will have to go the distance or knock him out cold.
yes lewis was clumsy and lazy. but hes always been that way. rahman was just quick enough and slick enough to do something about it. but i believe he will beat tyson.
in my opinions, tyson needs to go to a trainer he will listen to, like kevin rooney, and forget all that white man black man ****. kevin is the only one alive that knows what cus tamato taught him. poor mike, he is not even smart enough to remember his own fighting art and instead have to be trained! did you notice how the martial artists is let go after a while, and attends fights by himself, but the boxer needs to be told what to do? thats why such a few fighters become trainers. it takes a gift (or to be told you can do it). every black belter will go out at some time and teach or fight with no person in his corner.