hmmm
Newton’s work on cause and effect appeared to give the Deterministic philosophy, which I read had its origins in Ancient Greece, scientific clout. However!, Newton’s work dealt with physical bodies, not mind or spirit, or theoretical passage or development thereof. While, there would appear to be a sort of physics of living, I cannot say that it literally accounts for the myriad experiences of living, which probably include randomness. I don’t think things are that neat, and all is beyond total comprehension. That’s my opinion.
I don’t want to get into the Determinism, Karma, Newtonian triangle. I’ve done that already, recently. Man, what a headache I got. I have my beliefs, or lack thereof, and other people have theirs.
It’s okay to believe in a literal God, in a man with a long beard, in a conscious energy that created everything, etc. If one has a belief, however, I think one might tend to see both “truths” and “falsehoods” in terms of that belief system, no matter what it is. While you might not want to take things literally, whole belief systems are based on that literalism, or biblical literalism. No, I don’t believe that way, but I think we need to realize that for someone else this is a belief close to the heart, and not to be taken lightly.
One of my beliefs is that it is not what you believe in, but what you are, which is relevant.
Ryu, I think you were being rather good natured.
I will say that a belief is a belief is a belief, and nothing more. Some appear to have a foundation of sorts, yet, the fact is, it is a belief.
Best,
Cody