[QUOTE=cjurakpt;818641]so you were just venting, huh? ok, fair enough…as to arguing, there is no argument - you come on as an unknown individual to a forum with an air of superiority making some statements critical of how many people perceive / embody internal practice, in a way that implied that you are “in the know” as to what the real deal is; I’m simply asking what qualifies you to take that posture; certainly, you are under no obligation to “prove” anything, but if you present yourself as someone with some authority on a subject, then it only follows reasonably that others will ask for you to support your claims; what is interesting is that after coming on in a rather opinionated manner that you default to the old “I don’t have to prove anything to anyone” bit instead of stating straight out what the nature of your experience and background is; so hey, answer, don’t answer, no difference really, that’s certainly your purview; of course, sooner or later everyone’s perspective becomes apparent either directly or otherwise via their posts here, so it all comes out in the wash one way or another[/QUOTE]
Yep, just venting; and trying to dodge debates, to be honest. i’ve seen plenty of tautological debating on the internet, and it usually doesn’t benefit anyone.
My take is that MOST people into Nei Jia ARE IN THE KNOW that there IS more to the Nei Jia than advanced mechanics and a mild increase in circulation of qi to the extremities. i don’t claim to be “in the know” of something that isn’t common knowledge amongst most well known Nei Jia instructors.
What i do claim to be in the know of is what many message forum frequenters are not in the know of. This isn’t meant to single anyone specifically out… i just saw it as being the case with a lot of the posts on this thread. i don’t normally frequent this forum (or any for that matter), but this thread was brought to my attention by someone who i taught the practice to.
Unfortunately, many people take a seminar here and there, and then speak like they have some authority with which to dismiss advanced Nei Kung practices. Frankly, this is both irritating and is a disservice to instructors and students of Nei Jia. There is MUCH that we can ALL learn if we open our minds to the possibilities that the arbitrary limitations we have come to place on our practices are not necessarily anything but self-imposed limitations.
As i said, i don’t know of ANY Xingyi teachers who do not either practice “Iron Crotch” or accept that it is a very beneficial Nei Kung practice which they should do more often. This is not some obscure practice, nor is it dangerous if one has been taught how to do it properly (just as most of Martial Arts are dangerous if not properly instructed). i’ll be the FIRST to admit that the first time i heard of it i thought it was a joke (literally, as in made up). i also didn’t take “Iron Shirt” practices very seriously in the beginning.
What i hate to see is people imagining that the Nei Jia are just a different approach to mechanics and some mild use of Qi Kung (when in fact all Chinese Martial Arts employ Qi Kung to some extent). Unfortunately, in the U.S. (and perhaps elsewhere), there is a new generation of Nei Jia practitioner who dismisses much of the potential of the systems as legend. That’s fine, this is only their loss (and is perhaps Nature’s way of selecting who attains what level of skill), but for whatever purpose, i felt the impulse to comment on the matter when the thread was shown to me.
now there ya go!
just a follow-up question: what exactly do you mean by “lineage holder”? and what sect do you hold it in?
At first i thought you meant which Nei Jia styles am i lineaged in, so i listed them (all of them being Daoist in origin according in one manner or another). i study and am lineaged in other systems, but all three of the “Nei Jia” as Sun, Lu-T’ang characterized them, and as relevant to this forum.
…however, after posting, i re-read and it seems you mean “Daoist” lineage in and of itself. While i meant primary lineages in Hebei Xingyi, Yang T’aiji and Cheng Bagua (as well as other variants of each, which i had listed), i think - as stated - that you might mean what Daoist sect itself. If this is what you mean, this is another issue altogether, and one that i’d be happy to discuss through email, as it’s not an Order that has historically been public about itself (practically, or in terms of being Daoist), nor is it any major sect of Daoism (though it is Daoist). As such, i don’t want to open up tangential avenues of discussion on the same thread.