From the list of alexander"kaido"polintain
the guy who i can cliam knowledge of NgYimMing from, he was killed in the mid80s and im told stopped teaching in 1980, started in 72?.
i was described what i was taught as kajukenbo/hopgar style, and that Kaido taught emperado kajukenbo, ngyimming tibet whitcrane-HopGar, and in a article describing him it says he learnt some karate from richard kim and another fellow in sanfrancisco, it also states in sf he learn?Mantis and i think some internal style from a W.C.Wong, wich i have found no info about, it always leads to the HungGar Master Y.C.Wong:) .
Your Clarification of the dates and the detials from NgYimMings death, clarified all previous accounts i have found.
So now im back to my original enquiry, How much could kaido have learnt in that brief time?, He grew up in the phillipinnes studying arnis with his father, and he would have been entering his 30s by the time of HarryNgs death, so assuming he was fairly skilled in the martial arts, how much do you think the guys in the nightclass could have studied, i know the Tibet White Crane Curriculum is Deep, but due to the nature of the orginization, i doubt they were sitting around in Lotus

I’m told When Kaido started teaching in Montreal in 1972, in the hopgar he taught something like 30 combos, some chigung and the soft/hard set of HopGar wich i think is the Cotton In Needle?.
Then he also taught his students Kajukenbo.
Now the funny thing, im told he taught thirteen sets, the first bieng the first from Emperados kajukenbo, the next two is exactly like another two of Emperados sets, but using the kaju “tantui linestructure, similarity!!” using HopGar techniques.
The soft/hard set i mentioned is the 8th set i think, but the funny thing is the other sets, follow a traditional program similar to hunggars sets!, inthat the next set builds off the first in combination & complexity of skill, like the fourth set has a single low broom kick, then the next set uses a double broom sweep!.
Thing is it is literally all kajukenbo/hopgar form, mixed with what it seems some mantis and internal elements, so it is a modern made form, but from what i have seen in the kf press its definatly of a Traditional structure, wich is why i mentioned it resembles hunggas pillar lineup.
This is a basic assessment, from my limited understanding, and now i must enquire, how much Master Ming imparted, in his SF school. From how much Technique I see in what I practise, it has Alot of HopGar to be blunt,… so, I must assume, He strictly taught them how to fight, prolly based on line drills oppossed to mastering the traditional form structure" sitting in horse for four years and punching:D " when most of them, most likely already could fight?. So thats where i’m at, if you could give me your opinion on how effective these students would be under described conditions and the allotted timeframe, from me you would be much respected; and thats about it on NGYIMMING, except the general, do you know if he had any fights in Sf, did they goto comps?.
Also i think i read Ngyimming or his senior where the first to use the name HopGar"wandering Knight" to describe thier Lama!. Was it just HopGa associated with the triads, or Lama in general, you got pakhok, hopgar, mokgar??, and lama pai, dont know if thiers any more.
what do you think about this, in that article at greencloud, it gets to the wong bros in canton and wongyanlam sets up the leitei stage, and defeats 150 challengers??..
then it describes how the wongs kf split into bakhok, hopga, etc. Any idea how it got to the Chinese Mafias, and how big those lineages could get" does that make sence?"
Also, from Kaidos main senior he wrote me that he contacted NgYimMings main sf rep and he denied seeing kaido, so im thinking maybe Harry taught a day class to, and the senior talked to the legit master, and maybe kaido went to the nightschool, but i really assume, kaido maybe just had a friend in NgMings class.
I have read Salvatore Canzonieris"sp" article on Vagabond KungFu, im sure you know about the history of gypsy kf better than I, but could you tell me about Chinese Mafia KungFus technical structure" thiers enough books on thier history, and im not into that" but what i am into is Real Gung-Fu and i would imagine some of the more ruthless orginizations with century of history would have some crazy chinwoo type structures" to use modern speak:) "