I need to clairfy a bit for Ngokfei (I did not mean to come off too harsh).
First off, the old addage of “if you always do what you’ve always done, you will always get what you’v always gotten” tends to apply here. Before the USAKWF was around, there were a number of organizations and NONE of them talked to each other. Some of them actually kicked you out of their org if you were a member of one or another orgs besides theirs.
So, I don’t think going back to this model is workable.
Second, there has been a problem with everybody and his dog getting the idea “I’ll host a tournament…make some money and do it right” Then you end up with competitors having to choose which one to support - limited funds…and time - and it is a far cry from a win win situation. A lot of bad blood has come about from this.
Some of these events are fine…but it takes a lot of hard work and planning to do a good large torunament. Small torunaments are OK but the level of competition is limited. Then you have those events where it is obvious that the promoter is only interested in the money and not in a good and fair event for the competitor.
Then there is the biggest problem of all. We have many athletes and instuctors who do many things and ffer many things in their schools. You have some that do Traditional AND Modern form…but traditional fighting. Some who ONLY do modern. Some who do Traditional and Sanshou…and so on.
Now you take 3 or 4 or whatever organizations. They all have to provide value for the membership money they charge. The would have regular member dues, professional (coaches and teachers) and then even school dues. Now, many orgs. require their students to pay member dues to different orgs. this makes things more expensive…but that is not the real problem. If you are in a school that does Taijiquan, Traditional Kung Fu, and Sanshou, and there are Inernal, Traditional, Modern, and Sanshou orgs, do you join all 3 or do you join one…2…which one…and then, if the events are all scattered around and not timed together, which ones do you attend. Each event takes away from classes and cost travel time and money.
So, do you say, Well…I will go to this one and not that one… Then, if you only go to Sanshou, you don’t see the connection back to traditional techniques… If you only do Taijiquan, you don’t get to know or see other people who do external… and so on.
This type of thing, although still better than 25 different individual’s orgs is still not something that builds unity.
Now, if there can be separate organizations that tie together and have membership in one mean membership in the org that ties together…and then have them coordinate their events so there is economy of scale and competitors do not have to choose betewen groups, that is great…but the main way that happens is that those who are on the leadership board of one org tend to be on the other org’s as well. And that is not different from a single entity very much.
But still, the bottom line for ANHY organization is that joining it MUST provide a peceived value to the member. No one is going to give an organization much money if they do not feel that they get anything back from it. Right now, NONE of the organizations give ANYTHING MUCH to its members for the membership dues. This has to change or siad organizations will wither and die…and rightfully so.
Service for fee…or extinction.