No, you don’t get angry bl. Like the time you threatened to kill me. No anger there.
Of course you also said that you never lie, heh, heh, heh. 
I did ?? doesn’t sound like something I’d do but if I did you probably deserved it. Just kidding, I’m a buddhist dude. I don’t do violence regardless of what’s said or how it’s interperated 
Quoted from post by bl:
“fuc* you!!!” “I’d kill you” “I’d kill you. make no mistake” “today I’d hit you”
Every once in awhile the fake “Buddhist” mask slips & she shows her true colors.
I would should I choose. I more than likely wouldn’t but perfection is a high standard and as long as we continue aiming for it. Can’t really ask for any more
Unfortunately you’re not headed toward perfection in any way, shape or form.
You have, however, achieved a remarkable level of delusion. 
That is such an arrogant statement. You’ve never even met me and you have no idea what I’m about. You can be nasty for all worth, just want to contribute to my world and if it means occassionally put up with this jazz, it just does.
No bl, it’s not arrogant, just accurate.
I’ve read many of your posts on this thread (what the hell, nothin’ else to do since I work night shift security, heh, heh) and they give quite a good idea of what you’re like (while creating a thoroughly bad impression of the type of person you are).
It doesn’t surprise me that you would refer to my correcting your always erroneous information and showing the truth behind your lies as being “nasty”. You’re a liar and a loudmouth braggart. You act like you’re so superior, when every post you write points out your complete inferiority. It’s sad that you haven’t been banned yet. 
no Cerebus, I will share any experience or information I have ( almost ) that I think someone will benifit from. There’s little point talking to you though, because according to you, I may still be an old man in alabama or where ever you insisted I was. Well, we’re glad you’re onto it :rolleyes:
LOL! See what I mean? I was never even one of the people saying you were an old guy in Alabama, but you can’t even differentiate between us on this forum. :rolleyes:
And no, you don’t “share” info because you think it’ll help anyone. You talk garbage about things you know nothing about because it gratifies your huge, starving ego.
no but you know folks did and insisted on it, calling me a pathalogical liar for denying it. Same thing really isn’t it.
I share what I can to help because I’m a buddhist ( which is also according to you apparently not true ) and it’s a part of the way I function, despite comments like yours I receive for doing it. I 've had a vast array of experiences and not all of those I’d reccomend, but I will let folks know what I got out of it and they can draw their own conclusions. See you are at the moment, so focussed on the here and now that you forget the big picture. As a buddhist, and particularly a ch’an buddhist that’s all see most of time and why I’ll do what I can. How 'bout taking some of your trolling time and use it to meditate ??
Every time someone points out that you are wrong, and how you are wrong and why you are wrong, you resort to saying that they’re “trolling”. Of course we all know that you do that because you can never back up ANYTHING you say.
Your first two sentences clearly show how you have no grasp on reality. I’ll clarify this for you since you seem incapable of doing so for yourself (you can thank me later): NO, someone ELSE saying that you’re an old man in Alabama is NOT the “same thing” as ME saying that about you.
I know that’s a rather complex & advanced concept for you to grasp but go ahead and re-read it several times and then you can meditate upon it and see if that point ever gets through to you. Though I suspect it’s a bit much for you to comprehend.
The only reason you post on here is for what you yourself get out of it. Which is some warped sense of satisfaction at wasting peoples’ time with your malarky.
It would be nice if some day you would actually LEARN something about Buddhism, rather than just going around talking about how you’re a Buddhist (you’re not, you know).
being that I’ve finally had time lately, I’ve done little but provide proof. I don’t know Cerebus, I’m getting too old for this sh*t. Silly comments and conversation lacking substance ( or cuteness / humour at worst) do very little for me. And now , even though you’ve never met me , you 're going to stand solidly saying you know my most intimate spirit and beliefs :rolleyes:
really bored at work tonight ha.?
You’ve never provided ANY proof about anything. You just keep claiming that something is so until people get fed up & ignore you. In one of the English language discussions you were provided with proof straight from the dictionary, but you chose to ignore it and cling desperately to your mistaken ideas. How is that proof from you? Proof of your ignorance, yes. Proof for your argument, no.
You’re just a fool and will always be a fool. And a sad one at that. I’ve told you that you need some serious therapy. Like probably ongoing throughout your life. Otherwise you’ll always be delusional.
Guess you’ve missed the last weeks’ worth of links then ha? I don’t need to prove anything myself, and will even try to help you all with a link when I can manage the time.
Oh, on the English language queries, please see Serpent and Iron for links from places like Cambridge, confirming my use of language. :eek: :eek: :rolleyes:
Don’t you have work to do or something??
LOL! Ooooh, of course. It’s the whole REST of the world who needs to prove everything to YOU! You, of course, don’t need to have proof for ANY of your ridiculous claims. Typical of you Michelle.
As for your use of the English language, I have the links myself. They all agree that you’re wrong. :eek: :eek: :eek:
Care to stick your other foot in your mouth while you’re at it? :rolleyes:
now you’re just out and out lying, but entertaining none the less. Really, you should try a chat room.
See what I mean? Complete denial on your part.
You claimed that in adding the suffix “ing” to a word ending in “e”, you drop the vowel and double the consonant. Such as come= comming, bite=bitting, etc. Every dictionary out there, including Cambridge and Websters says otherwise. You just drop the “e” & add “ing” Who’s the liar now? Mmmm hmmm.:rolleyes:
You claimed that the apostrophe as used to indicate possessive ONLY comes AFTER the “s”. WRONG! Using the same resources as above it can be verified that a singular possessive places the apostrophe BEFORE the “s”. Only a plural possessive or possessive with a word which already ends in “s” places the apostrophe after.
But all this seems to be WAY over your head, and you’ll never admit it, even if I was standing right there holding the open dictionary right in front of your eyes. You’ve decided you’ll make up your own reality and live in it rather than actually waking up to the reality of the rest of the world. Pitiful.
that’s still be you. I think I’ve already provided a link on that where both are acceptable pending where you come from. Da*med crazy American spelling.
The boys have the apostrophe link, the "ish as a suffix " link and some good urls if you’re up for an english lesson :eek: :o
Go home already. Turkey
Oh, this is TOO funny! Check out bl’s superior English:
“that’s still be you” LOL! Make sense much, michelle?
“I think I’ve already provided a link on that where both are acceptable”
No, actually you never did. You said you had one and you’d get back to us with it (which you always say, but never do).
The only one here needing an English lesson is you (but we already know that, don’t we bl). I’ve already given you enough lessons on every subject you’ve ever brought up to have retired by now if I hadn’t been doing it as charity work.
so my typing s*x on occassion. What else do you have??
Yah, pretty sure I did provide that link, and if you’re lucky I may post it again in the near future…in the name of ( and the term is called Pro Bono ) charity service. :rolleyes: Thank criminey I didn’t give you my last name!! That’s how many times in the last hour or so??