The Consciousness of Focusing

Here is an artice my Sifu wrote, thought some peope here might be interested to read it. (i think its probably very different to the way most poeple think about WC)

S.Teebas

The Consciousness of Focusing

Focusing is a conscious intention; a thinking with an aim. Although one wants to focus or concentrate one’s force to the opponent, one should not physically force one’s body to do such movements like pushing forward in order to achieve the focusing intention. If the muscle is forced to move forward, it will become tensed and will become more so especially when it was under pressure from the opponent. Tensed up muscles will decrease the mass one can use and also the mobility of one’s movements will deteriorate which means the ability to attack will decrease. Those forced movements are techniques and are not the movements which are expected to happen under focusing. Physically, the intention of focusing brings out only the most natural conscious movements one uses in the daily life and these natural movements will already produce power.

In the article of ‘Wing Chun Power’, we have discussed the formation of power which is from the combination of mass and speed together. The importance of focusing in Wing Chun is not that it can increase the power one has developed. The important is on the side that focusing can concentrate and direct the force developed continuously to the target even though the mass is still moving. As focusing is an intention to concentrate and direct, it does not require the support from the muscular side of the body. This explains the point as mentioned in the article of ‘Wing Chun Power’ that movements will not affect focusing and focusing also will not restrict the mobility of the body. Therefore, one can attack the opponent at different angles and the power generated from the motions of the mass will be concentrated and directed by focusing intention to the target.

In practicing focusing, one should start with the Siu Nim Tau form. Firstly, we should be familiar with the movements of the form. At the second stage, we have to concentrate on the continuation of the focusing intention. If we cannot perform the form fluently, our mind will switch between movements and correct intention which make focusing on and off all the time. At the last stage, we have to fill up this focusing intention inside every part of our bodies. At that time, when one’s mind is trying to plan one’s attack, it will not affect the stability of the focusing. Actually, as long as focusing intention exists, it will make one’s body react more naturally and properly.

Focusing begins with Siu Nim Tau form, but after one understands how to train up the intention, one can also practice it at the other two forms: Chum Kiu and Biu Gee. Practicing focusing intention need to start with the forms because self-training can be more easier to concentrate one’s mind when one’s body is not affected by the outside force.

This does not mean that one can fully train up the focusing intention with the forms only because we need to maintain the continuation of focusing when one is under pressure in a continued moving situation. Therefore, one has to practice sticking hands. One needs to maintain our focusing when under pressure and continuously being disturbed by the opponent. If one only uses one’s body to deal with the opponent during sticking hands, signals such as: fighting against, self-protecting, not wanting to be hit or feeling tired in the muscles, will appear in one’s mind. Then, it is impossible for one to keep the training on focusing. In order to reduce the disturbance, one needs to maintain the flexibility of the movements which depends on the perfection of one’s structure.

Articles can only explain an individual part of Wing Chun. If one just concentrate on a certain part of the system, one cannot explore the true power of Wing Chun. The success of Wing Chun depends on whether one can merge all the parts together as one and makes it as close to perfect as possible.

Susana Ho (2/2002)

Ok! The forum has shat it’s self!!

Heres the address:

www.hchwingchun.com.au

S. Teebas

I for one thank you for sharing the article. It was reasonably short for an informative post IMO. Best wishes, Yuanfen

there are some parts that I would disagree with. Although it is a pretty good article, I believe that some parts are not accurate.

The Part about using the muscles. First of all, tensing up muscles cannot change the mass. Scientifically impossible. It can change the shape of the mass.

However, changing the mass one can use, is also technically incorrect. The idea, is that relaxing the muscles follows the principle of saving energy. Therefore only the minimum of muscles required for the job are used to obtain the greatest of results.

What occurs then, is that the muscle fibers, are ignited to send the arm into motion, then completely relaxes while the arm continues to travel. thus Power = M X A X d/ T.

First of all, tensing up muscles cannot change the mass.

Yeah, But it can change the mass you are using.

It can change the shape of the mass.

Mass doesnt have a shape! what shape is 5 kgs? what shape is 500 tones?.. etc…

However, changing the mass one can use, is also technically incorrect. The idea, is that relaxing the muscles follows the principle of saving energy.

You can do both. The idea behind relaxing to use mass is to increase the colective mass (of the entire body)…which also, as you have said, has the doubling effect of saving energy. The collective relaxed mass can be applied to the physics formula Mass X Acceleration = Force

Therefore only the minimum of muscles required for the job are used to obtain the greatest of results.

Agreed!

d or T

What does d or t mean?

Mass does have a shape. namely you and I and every living thing and non living thing in the universe has a shape..and is made up of mass. therefore.mass has a shape. Weight does not have a shape.

You neatly neglected the parts which I did mention of how to use the muscle fibers to one’s benefit.
Which confirms what I said about how mass is used, and how both ACTUALLY work together.

Force = Mass X Acceleration
Work =Force X Distance
Power = Work / Time

Therefore
Power = Mass X Acceleration X Distance over Time;)

Mass does have a shape. namely you and I and every living thing and non living thing in the universe has a shape..and is made up of mass. therefore.mass has a shape. Weight does not have a shape.

What about sand? Does that have mass or only weight?

You neatly neglected the parts which I did mention of how to use the muscle fibers to one’s benefit.

Where are the muscle fibres? I dont know if this is right or wrong. What you say does make sence from my current knowledge. But what i think you are missing is how you can really use the most mass you have… refer to below quote you said earlier.

First of all, tensing up muscles cannot change the mass

Interesting how you “neatly neglected” to address this point;)

Force = Mass X Acceleration
Work =Force X Distance
Power = Work / Time

Therefore
Power = Mass X Acceleration X Distance over Time

Yep.

How about:

Force is proportortional to acceleration provided the mass is kept constant.

Would it not be better to keep a constant, such as …relaxation…as opposed to tensing (dynamic…hmm dont know if thats the word im looking for) …anyway.

I forgot this one; maybe you can fill in the blank…

? = mass x acceleration squared

All those power formulas get confusing…

:slight_smile:

Being tense or not won’t change your mass… However, If you’re tense, you’ll be holding some of the mass up, but if you are completly relaxed you’ll be able to let all that weight just drop down.

S.Teebas,
Yes sand has mass.

I believe we were reffering to the mass of the arm as it punches. and if it tenses. Am I wrong? or at least that is the part that makes contact with your opponent for the most part.
Muscle fibers- in reference to the arm.

Never did I neglect the body mass either.That was understood on my part.
Force being proportional to acceleration as long as the mass remains constant is explained by the formula
F= Mass X Acceleration.
Hope this helps.

I thought this article was pretty good, though the language used tends to obscure rather than clarify in places. I think it is folly to take the concepts of “mass” and “speed” as used in the article as relating to the strict definitions of the terms as used in the science physics, and thus arguing about them in those terms to be an exercise with little merit. Dont’ let that stop you if you disagree.

I’ve seen the concept of intent as discussed here mentioned by articles from or about other MA’s such as Scott Sonnon and Jean Jacques Machado. A strongly focused intent (e.g to knock the opponent down, or to achieve positional dominance over submission) allows the tactical techniques best used by the fighter to be made evident automatically as both participants act and react.

Those physics equations refer to a mathematical point, not complex systems, so they aren’t directly applicable.

Think Again!!!
Actually they are directly related Kung Fu Cowboy.

Roy…

Never did I neglect the body mass either.That was understood on my part. Force being proportional to acceleration as long as the mass remains constant is explained by the formula

Agreed, but what i meant was that stabilisation of the force requires a constant, which as you have said is mass. But to stabilise mass…relaxation can unify the mass propery. Not simply to save energy (relaxation)… it has more than one function.

Kung Fu cowboy…
How does it not relate?

I agree S. Teebas…also though many people speak as though power only comes if the stance is well grounded, as though a moving body will not have power. this is not true. a moving bidy can have power, but then it becomes a matter of coordination of the Hands with Feet. No Feet , no hands. :slight_smile:

Originally posted by S.Teebas
Kung Fu cowboy…
How does it not relate?

Not to speak for Kung Fu cowboy, but I believe that he is referring to the fact that a formula such as F=m*a is a highest level of abstraction, and applies best to very simple models. The more complex the system becomes the less directly the formula applies. More complex systems require more complex formulas to accurately describe them.

Even though that may be the case, the formula really does apply well enough for the purposes of a general discussion, IMHO.

Regards,

Matrix

Well Matrix…overly simplified Wing Chun becomes too mysterious…too complex, simply because many aspects of Wing Chun are missing. Therefore, a more complex Wing Chun actually becomes more simplified, and corelates with these formulas, as evidenced by the movements of the WIng Chun system.:cool:

Roy,
How profound. :cool:

Thanks,
Matrix

Thank You. Matrix…however we should be aware of how much deterioration of the system has already occured from this oversimplification which has been going on till this day.:cool:

I have been told such things by my sifu, however, it never hurts to be reminded and remain vigilant.

Thanks again,
Matrix