The Saudi Ambassador to the U.N. has just finished giving a
speech,and
walks out into the lobby where he meets his American counterpart. They
shake hands and as they walk the Saudi says, “You know, I have just one
question about what I have seen in America”. The American says “Well
your
Excellency, anything I can do to help you I will do.” The Saudi whispers
My son watches this show ‘Star Trek’ and in it there are Russians and
Blacks and Asians, but never any Arabs. He is very upset. He doesn’t
understand why there are never any Arabs in Star Trek." The American
laughs
and leans over. “That’s because it takes place in the future.”
Yeah that’s supergay, especially when you considder that the whole star trek thingie is suppose to be about a united earth and not devided as it is now.
In theory when met with the fact that ET’s exist the whole planet stops thinking of themselves as one country vs another country and now it’s earth vs the world so it unites them and stops ethnic disputes and racism.
One of those jokes where you go “oh, that’s sick man” but do actually find faintly amusing. But it is in incredibly bad taste, and I’m suprised its still on here.
and humor is an excuse to have a racist view or to share a racist comment? i don’t give a fûck if you don’t necessarily agree with it or find it funny. if it’s racist, it’s racist, so don’t fûcking post it.
There are only two kinds of people fish doesn’t like: bigots and arabs. Oh yeah, ****sexuals, too. There are only three kinds of people fish doesn’t like, not including politicians, mexicans, cubans, koreans, individuals from the Republic of Congo, Balinese, Swahili, and liberals.
All right, so there’s only eleven kinds of people fish doesn’t like, unless you’re counting the chinese, well, the mainland chinese, though he generally doesn’t care for the Hong Kong chinese, and chinese living abroad really **** him off, he just wishes they’d go home.
Aside from those groups, fish is OK with everyone else. Except welfare mothers. Oh, yeah, little kids who fall down wells suck in his opinion, not to mention children with rickets, small pox, distended bellies, and all those kids who have that disease where they look like old people, god he hates those kids.
To my knowledge, Fish does not hate the Leichtensteinians. That’s good for something, isn’t it?
It’s funny how you use a word like “gay” to describe a joke you don’t like then complain about bigotry. Anyone here ever laugh at the “whitey” jokes on Night at the Apollo? I do.Of course I have a sense of humor.
I don’t believe it was Fishs intent to insult Arabs, only the scumbags we are at war with.
okay hosers, question for you: an idea occurred to me as i was writing that last post, because i was trying to come up with negative things to say about afghanis that also applied to us, and i had no problem doing it. they’re mysogenists, and the western world is still nowhere near equal in respect to gender treatment. they’re oppressive of alternative ideals, but if you say to a group of people at a social event that you feel very strongly about some of the socialist and communist ideas marx proposed, i wonder how many people will continue to talk to you for the rest of the night.
now the idea: could the reason we’re stuck with pretty pathetic insults for other groups (towel heads, dagos, etc.) is that other comments, like sexist or oppressive or other such things, also apply to us, and we’re afraid of being categorized by terms like that, so we stick to simpler names? as in, wet back will always apply to a hispanic person, ad infinitum (or is it nauseum?:mad: )
anyhoo, my summed-up point – do we use simple, rather dopey names for other groups because the truly important things (being called a wet back because you crossed a river to get into the states isn’t as bad as sexist oppressive babykiller) may also apply to us?
your thoughts, ladies and gentlemen, would be appreciated on this. and if this needs to be taken elsewhere, feel free to e-mail me.
