Our forum receives legal complaints every few months. It’s fairly common for a forum of this magnitude, as I’m sure you can imagine. Most of the complaints are simply that - complaints, but with a lawyer behind them - and none have gone to the point of lawsuit. Nor do I expect any ever will. Part of my job is to make sure that doesn’t happen. A ‘cease and desist’ is just the first step towards a lawsuit and an agreement can always be reached before the situation becomes dire.
With this recent complaint, we agreed that the affair remain confidential. I will stand by that confidentiality. I can reveal that there were a few posts deleted off some very old posts in some very old threads. No one was banned. lkfmdc and taai gihk yahn and perhaps a few others, deleted some of the threads that they had started, which is an option for any thread that you start that hasn’t been locked. This was their decision. There were no requests of them to do so.
I have had a few members express fear about posting now. They feel they cannot express themselves freely for fear of lawsuit. There is an intrinsic problem with that line of thinking which really lies with the member and what they post. Nothing has changed legally. You are as legally responsible for anything you post here, just as you are anywhere on the web. Know that as long as you are willing to delete something that has generated a complaint, it is unlikely that you will ever be sued.
Besides, like this situation, and all the other situations that have preceded it and will follow, they’ll come after me first.
So, when we post up is that technically publishing? Because the rules are different for publishing comments and comments made in person. To me, I always consider this a conversation like a town hall, not like an article. Just how accountable are you for what you say? If I write “my opinion is that” before everything I say, does that make a difference? I know it does when talking in person. You can have any opinion you want, really. Where is that line? Just curious. Seems like the right time to ask.
[QUOTE=Syn7;1220545]So, when we post up is that technically publishing? [/QUOTE] The law is still somewhat ambiguous on what happens on the web. Especially with the rapidity of content production and advancements in technology with social media, well, it takes time to make a law and the laws aren’t quite keeping up. Forums like this one are somewhat passe in the light of facebook, Twitter, Instagram and Pheed. Those are even harder to control legally as they aren’t as easily searchable, and are much noisier platforms.
There are some laws in place in some states to prevent cyberbullying, and some of what happens here might fall under that, depending what legal lens might focus on it. As for slander and libel, which is most frequently tossed about here as an accusation, there is always the potential for such. However, unlike print, the web is flexible. Offending content can simply be deleted and that’s the end of the story.
Just don’t say anything offensive. Seriously, how hard is that?
Ok, ok, I know. For most of you, that’s pretty hard.
I’m sure the confidentiality clause is surely frustrating to you all - it is for me too - but the truth of the matter is that it’s all absurdly trivial. Such is legalese.
If any of you were to transgress into forbidden territory (and it’s very unlikely that you will, at least with this particular issue), it will be treated just like before. There would be a warning, perhaps a deletion, perhaps an eventual banning. Have no fear. It has always been so. I am sorry that you all were exposed to some of the behind-the-scenes chaos that goes on while running this here forum, but that too, has always been so.
i think i undesrtand why ross and taighik are so passionate. they actually dedicated their lives to this. theres no turning back. especially when kung fu is so obscure now in america. guys your age oversaw the rise and wane of a subculture.
for ross, watching something you helped create die is painful.
other than the occasional niche business like kung fu magazine, kung fu is not really a good way to make money. the gold rush is over. the healthy path of the future is a wulin without money.
the core of kung fu is hypermasculine pagan spiritualism infused morality. this is never going to become popular.
the moment you accept having only 2 or 3 students, or just 1, you will feel better. the day of 100 man conveyor belt dojos are over.
[QUOTE=GeneChing;1220583]Ok, ok, I know. For most of you, that’s pretty hard.
I’m sure the confidentiality clause is surely frustrating to you all - it is for me too - but the truth of the matter is that it’s all absurdly trivial. Such is legalese.
If any of you were to transgress into forbidden territory (and it’s very unlikely that you will, at least with this particular issue), it will be treated just like before. There would be a warning, perhaps a deletion, perhaps an eventual banning. Have no fear. It has always been so. I am sorry that you all were exposed to some of the behind-the-scenes chaos that goes on while running this here forum, but that too, has always been so.
To quote the Brits “Keep calm and carry on”.[/QUOTE]
I appreciate your position and will do my best.
Oh and I randomly clicked your banners. Just doing my part
Trolls.
