Lightsaber martial art
I was corresponding with Ben Judkins on a different matter entirely, when this came up. Ben gave me permission to share it. ![]()
Is Lightsaber Combat a Martial Art? (Episode I)
POSTED BY BENJUDKINS MARCH 18, 2016

A meeting of the Golden Gates Knights. Instructor Alain Block (right) leads a class. Source: Associated press, image by Jeff Chiu.
This is the first half of two part article. However, readers may actually want to begin by reading my recent post What are âmartial arts,â and why does knowing matter?
âIt [Ludosport] started in 2006 in Italy. A few friends got some lightsabers as gifts and being into martial arts and re-enactment fanatics they decided to see if there was a way they could make it into a sport, and they did. They spent hundreds of hours consulting many different martial artists and fencing coaches to make sure that they got a really good sport.
Itâs not a martial art. Weâre not trying to teach people how to cause physical harm, in fact thatâs exactly the opposite of what weâre trying to do. We want something thatâs fast and fun, that people can enjoy.â
Jordan Court, Instructor of the Ludosport England, Lighstaber Combat Academy in Bristol (UK) as quoted in the Bristol Post, January 29th 2015.
â[Flynn:] People laugh at us and say, âThatâs not a real martial art!â I say, why donât you pick one up and try.
[Damon Honeycutt:] They can say all they wantâŚyou know what I mean. But the fact is we are practicing and they are not.â
âFlynnâ and Damon Honeycutt. Reclaiming the Blade, DVD2. Bonus Feature: New York Jedi. 2009. Min. 4:14.
Introduction: What are Martial Arts?
Is lightsaber combat a martial art? This seemingly odd question may have important implications for how we understand critical concepts within the field of martial arts studies. It also promises to shed light on the fundamental processes by which the traditional martial arts have been revived, reimagined and invented in the modern era.
As both a relatively new and radically interdisciplinary research area, martial arts studies is currently enjoying a period of rapid conceptual development. Nowhere is this more evident than in attempts to define the term âmartial art.â While it is in many ways synonymous with the field, only a minority of the foundational texts in our literature have attempted to define this concept or to explore it in ways that would point to new avenues for research. Nor has the existing literature coalesced around a single definition.
In a previous post we saw that researchers have adopted at least three discrete strategies when attempting to craft their understanding of this concept. The first, and most widely used, might be referred to as the âsociological strategy.â It simply accepts the social or cultural consensus on the question as it has arisen within a tightly focused research area.
Given that everyone in 21st century Japan simply âknowsâ that kendo, karate and aikido are martial arts, there may not be an urgent need to further explore the matter when discussing some aspect of Japanese martial studies. This is especially true as so many works currently being produced adopt an âarea studiesâ approach which calls for a deep examination of the historical, social or even linguistic forces affecting developments in only a single region or state. It may seem beyond the bounds of a given research project to deeply explore what characteristics make both kendo and karate âmartial artsâ given their many historical differences. The existing consensus is simply accepted as a social fact.
Nevertheless, future theoretical development within martial arts studies requires a greater emphasis on comparative case studies. This research strategy often necessitates comparing practices that have arisen in very different times or places. For instance, what makes both capoeira and kendo martial arts, and how can both be understood in light of the economic, political and social changes that swept the globe in the 19th century? In cases such as this it is no longer possible to avoid definitional discussion. For better or worse, classification and categorization are at the heart of the comparative enterprise.
Towards this end scholars have attempted to define the martial arts in at least two different ways. First, they have advanced short âuniversalâ definitions meant to identify those activities deemed to be âmartial artsâ within the broader category of all social practices. Further, most of these authors have attempted to advance relatively abstract definitions that can be applied to any society, time or place.
As we saw in our previous post, such efforts can be challenging. And while identifying âmartial artsâ in the abstract, most of these discussions provide no way of knowing where one style ends and the next begins. Are wing chun, weng chun and white crane three different styles, or simply three interpretations of the same regional fighting tradition? Scholars need a concept that can help us to address questions such as this.
A second group of authors have developed definitions that seek to classify the wide range of observed martial arts along different metrics. Some authors, such as Donn Draeger, sought to separate the truly âmartialâ from the âcivilianâ fighting systems. Unfortunately his system seems to be based on a now dated understanding of Japanese military history. And in any case, it is not always possible to draw a clean distinction between the military and civil realms.
Other students have looked at the specific goals motivating individuals to practice the martial arts. Perhaps the most common division in the literature is a three part typology separating the competitive combat sports, traditional arts (focused on self-development and health) and self-defense or combat arts. While this cuts to the heart of the ways in which the martial arts are often discussed in popular culture, this approach has trouble dealing with the huge amount of variation found within any single tradition. In China it is not that hard to find Wushu coaches who approach the Taiji forms as competitive sports, while some of their students will go on to teach similar forms as traditional health practices.
continued next post



















