Hello,
My question to you, Wing Chun students is:
QUESTION: “Do you apply in combat all those ‘flowered’ techniques seen on the forms or you just do full-contact alike combats living all those techniques apart?”
Speak for yourself, not for the whole style, do you use them in your combat?
My answer is: Yes.
My question is: What flowery moves?!
Sunt hic etiam sua praemia laveli
“Here too virtue has its due reward.”
I’d have to say and ask the same things…
yes
as best as I am able to:)
Dai yut tow dai 
laffer- do you study Wing Chun? what makes
you think that we wouldn’t use techniques from
our forms?
I get the impression that maybe your exposure
to Wing Chun is very limited or someone has
been jerking your chain.
What exactly is your experience with Wing Chun?
Sometimes!..If I feel like it!.. 
…What a bizarre question! 
C’est la vie!
I think he means the one legged stances and hurrican kicks that make up the bulk of WC.
Adventure is just a romantic name for trouble. It sounds swell when you write about it, but it’s hell when you meet it face to face in a dark and lonely place.
Louis L’Amour
Rogue!
there are penalties for revealing our secrets! 
maybe “wing chun” in portugese means
“pat morita”
(o.k.,I’ll shut up now)
After posting the thread I realized I got mixed up.
I wanted to ask not you (wing chun students) and not on the wing chun style and section, BUT the question was to the wushu people.
Once again sorry, I got all mixed up.
oh well then
i mean to suggest that Chum Kui’s 740’ spinning triple back kick had no use in a fight.
Don’t worry laffer, Wu Shu, WC, JKD they’re all pretty much the same thing anyway.
By the way, Welcome to the forum laffer, good to have you aboard.
Adventure is just a romantic name for trouble. It sounds swell when you write about it, but it’s hell when you meet it face to face in a dark and lonely place.
Louis L’Amour
Thanks