ive got this in a book, and it states shaolins ethical code ssometihng like 20 different things under 3 different categories of what you must do and dont do. And its got some really hard to apply things in this day and age like.
If you see the weak getting oppressed it is your duty to help them etc etc.
This is because THC is not an alkaloid. It does not contain a nitrogen atom, therefore it is a terpenophenolic compound
there are examples of codified behavior given in a book called ‘100 Unorthodox Stratagies’ [translated by Ralph D. Sawyer, ISBN:0-81332861-6]
the codified behavior discussed in this book is military in nature, and mostly relating to training, battlefield discipline, etc.
[one interesting point in this book is the use of special forces, in 5 man teams, each man responsible for his entire team. if 1 man fails, they all do, etc. just like modern US special forces, i believe]
a very very cool book if you have a few bucks to spend.
each tactic is illustrated by a historical account of it’s use, so you get some pretty cool stories to boot.
i’ve read it twice.
its from a book by wong kiew kit , i cant remember the name its not here rite now , but wong kiew kit has 2 good books on kung fu
one of them is a fat book which goes into detail about shaolin kung fu.
This particular one is a very thin green book with a huge picture of him saluting on the front.
Its quite good actually as it has a form performed step by step by him and the applications of it. IT sgood for begginers but even for somone who is advanced , you see for example how people misunderstand techniques and screw them up.
eg, in the thread “how to block a muay thai round kick” it shows this application that would get your head blown off, wong kiew kit does the same application but for a side kick and you see the difference of how youre not in such danger.
This is because THC is not an alkaloid. It does not contain a nitrogen atom, therefore it is a terpenophenolic compound
That, i can’t argue with. the TTC is a good read. and i definitely believe it has a lot of light to shed on martial arts. just not a particularly specific light. it doesn’t specifically address martial virtue. in fact, daoism, on the whole, doesn’t really address ethics. it’s relatively amoral.
i had a feeling it wouldn’t. but i thought it was worth mentioning.
in fact, i suspect that sun tzu’s take on martial virtue would be that it gets in the way. i picture him as being a little more pragmatic than that, for better or worse.