Kung Fu Magazine: Your Source for Chinese Martial Arts

Go Back   Kung Fu Magazine Forums > Wai Jia: The Kung Fu Forum > Kung Fu Forum
Register FAQ Members List Social Groups Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

View Poll Results: was confuscious a great fighter
yes, very much so 1 11.11%
nah, may be some minimal skills to defend 1 11.11%
maybe so 3 33.33%
need more research 4 44.44%
Voters: 9. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-03-2007, 03:23 AM
SPJ's Avatar
SPJ SPJ is offline
Wandering Cloud
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: California
Posts: 8,519
Send a message via AIM to SPJ Send a message via Yahoo to SPJ
Was Confuscious good at fighting

some said yes. Kong Fu Zi's father was a good fighter with a lot of strength.

Confuscious must have known how to fight and defend himself so that he was pretty safe and unharmed while wandering around 6 kingdoms.

--

the scholars in the academia in China said not so.

the son of the poet Li Bai may not be a good poet.

--

what do you think?

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-03-2007, 04:48 AM
bodhitree bodhitree is offline
Mod
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Steelers' Country
Posts: 3,491
who the f**k knows? that's not an option on this poll.
__________________
What's the point
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-03-2007, 07:06 AM
SanHeChuan's Avatar
SanHeChuan SanHeChuan is offline
Seven Star Prophet
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 1,653
Where is the "He was a Little Beotch" option?
__________________
- 三和拳

"Civilize the mind but make savage the body" Mao Tse Tsung

"You're certainly intelligent enough to know how to be a good person without the lead weights of religious dogma." Serpent

"There is no evidence that the zombie progeny of an incestuous space ghost cares what people do." MasterKiller

"If there isn't a chance that you're going to lose in a fight, then you're not fighting tough enough competition." ShaolinTiger00

BLOG
MYSPACE
FACEBOOK
YOUTUBE
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-03-2007, 07:16 AM
xcakid's Avatar
xcakid xcakid is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,323
Not sure but I do know that Confuscious says:

He who goes thru turnstile with hard on is going to Bangkok.
He who goes to sleep with itchy butt wakes up with stinking fingers.

That guys is an edujumacated dude, I tell ya what.
__________________
Master of Shaolin I-Ching Bu Ti, GunGoPow and I Hung Wei Lo styles.

I am seeking sparring partner. Any level. Looking for blondes or redhead. 5'2" to 5'9". Between 115-135 weight class. Females between 17-30 only need apply. Will extensively work on grappling.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-03-2007, 07:30 AM
bodhitree bodhitree is offline
Mod
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Steelers' Country
Posts: 3,491
The real question is could Plato fight, or st. augustine?
__________________
What's the point
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-03-2007, 07:46 AM
SPJ's Avatar
SPJ SPJ is offline
Wandering Cloud
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: California
Posts: 8,519
Send a message via AIM to SPJ Send a message via Yahoo to SPJ
ya. the main thing is that Kong Fu Zi was thought to be among the 4 olds to be destroyed during cultural revolution.

His status is now restored.

there are more opening discussion on China's scholars in the university and national TV.

this is one heated debate and blogs in China.

--

etc etc.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-03-2007, 07:58 AM
SPJ's Avatar
SPJ SPJ is offline
Wandering Cloud
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: California
Posts: 8,519
Send a message via AIM to SPJ Send a message via Yahoo to SPJ
http://www.chinanews.cn/news/2005/2007-02-05/33133.html

a family tree.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-03-2007, 08:45 AM
PangQuan PangQuan is offline
Unregistered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 3,386
it is said that confucius was known to carry a straight sword with him.

either in the analects of confucius or the book of mencius, i cannot remember which i read that in.
__________________
A man has only one death. That death may be as weighty as Mt. Tai, or it may be as light as a goose feather. It all depends upon the way he uses it....
~Sima Qian

Master pain, or pain will master you.
~PangQuan

"Just do your practice. Who cares if someone else's practice is not traditional, or even fake? What does that have to do with you?"
~Gene "The Crotch Master" Ching

You know you want to click me!!
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-03-2007, 09:27 PM
SPJ's Avatar
SPJ SPJ is offline
Wandering Cloud
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: California
Posts: 8,519
Send a message via AIM to SPJ Send a message via Yahoo to SPJ
yes. he also said that

" there is no dispute/contest among gentlemen, if has to, then resolve the dispute with shooting the arrow with a bow."

then he must have known the archery (on horseback)?!


Last edited by SPJ; 05-03-2007 at 09:39 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-03-2007, 09:28 PM
SPJ's Avatar
SPJ SPJ is offline
Wandering Cloud
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: California
Posts: 8,519
Send a message via AIM to SPJ Send a message via Yahoo to SPJ
Lun Yu in 23 languages;

http://www.confucius.org/main01.htm

Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 05-03-2007, 09:41 PM
tug's Avatar
tug tug is offline
Re Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Land O' Lakes, FL
Posts: 596
He was a scholar, not a fighter.

Whether he knew how to fight or not will probably never be known as his legacy is of thought, not action.

No?
__________________
Embrace your enemy, for he is not - he is just confused.
-bote
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"It is very hard to unleash the dragon and then put it back in the box without being devoured in the process."
-Sifu Abel
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 05-03-2007, 09:51 PM
D-FENS's Avatar
D-FENS D-FENS is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: the Whammy Burger
Posts: 114
Confucius would tap out Lao Tzu in 10 seconds flat. And the Buddha would pwn Confucius with his mad archery skillz. But Mohammed would kill them all.
__________________
GOD BLESS THE WORKING STIFF!!!
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 05-04-2007, 06:25 AM
golden arhat's Avatar
golden arhat golden arhat is offline
GKK 4 LIFE
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: manchester UK
Posts: 2,208
Send a message via MSN to golden arhat Send a message via Yahoo to golden arhat
Quote:
Originally Posted by bodhitree View Post
The real question is could Plato fight, or st. augustine?

plato was a well respected wrestler in his day

in fact the name plato was given to him by his teacher and i think it meant something like broad shouldered

as for confucious
he founded his own method of wushu

so i would asume he would have some skills

but then you do hear stories about how such and such a grand master from such and such a style killed so many people at once with one blow etc etc

so weither he founded his own style or not proves nothing in regards to his fighting skill
__________________
there are only masters where there are slaves

www.myspace.com/chenzhenfromjingwu



Quote:
Originally Posted by Shaolin Wookie View Post
5. The reason you know you're wrong: I'm John Takeshi, and I said so, beeyotch.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 05-08-2007, 02:09 AM
gfx gfx is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 127
He was definitely good at the military arts of the time.
Confucius advocated the education of a gentry ( junzi ) through the study of six arts ( Liu Yi ): Mannerisms/Rituals ( Li ), Music, Archery, Chariot, Literature, and Numerics.

Amongst the six arts, two are martial skills. This certainly reflects the importance Confucius placed on martial studies, as well as their importance in the society at the time.

Confucius is known for his skill in charioteering and archery. Note that during the Spring Autumn period, horses are not used in warfare yet. In war, the two most important weapons were archery and chariots. Infantry men were equipped with Ge, Ji or spears, and swords were short, and only used as last resort.

There is no clear document that says Confucius is a skilled swordsman, but we can deduce from the period that he certainly would be not untrained. The educated of the period ( Shi ) were expected to carry swords, and officials in a kingdom were expected to lead the army to battle in warfare.

In essence, being able to lead armies in battle and being trained with swords and fighting was not considered very special in those times. Confucius was a man of many skills, but he was most revered and remembered with his teachings of philosophy. Just as Da Vinci was also an excellent inventor and scientist, but people remember him mostly for his paintings.

People tend to regard Confucius as a weak man like many of the later Confucian scholars. But that's actually false, and the weakling image was caused by the neo-confucians of Song dynasty.

Speaking of Li Bai, he was actually a very skilled swordsman and studied under the sword saint Pei Min ( 裴旻 )
__________________
http://individual.utoronto.ca/gfx/logo1.jpg

"A witty saying proves nothing."
- Voltaire (1694-1778)
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:57 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.