Kung Fu Magazine: Your Source for Chinese Martial Arts

Go Back   Kung Fu Magazine Forums > Wai Jia: The Kung Fu Forum > Wing Chun
Register FAQ Members List Social Groups Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #16  
Old 12-03-2011, 04:32 PM
Niersun Niersun is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Everywhere and nowhere
Posts: 107
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lee Chiang Po View Post
I I have never learned anything in an actual fight.
You tend to learn afterwards when you reflect on it. If you remember anything.

Anyhow, it appears im turning into a theorist. No longer doing forms (art) or fighting (who goes around looking for fights and have no time for competition?)
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 12-10-2011, 07:26 PM
hulkout hulkout is offline
Beast from the East
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 84
People have different takes on what is art and what is just fighting. Frankly, I think the whole thing is ridiculous. Every martial art, no matter how you dress it up, is designed for fighting. Plain and simple. Yes there is sprituality, humility, respect, but that depends more on the person. Someone can learn boxing and from it learn humility, respect, skill, focus, all the things that a more traditional art would give you. Then you can have someone who trains in a traditional art who's nothing but a punk. Whos to say it's not a martial art just because there are no flowery forms or there isn't a figure of General Kwan in the school?

The problem is that people have gotten so far away from the original intent of martial art and each generation gets more and more watered down. If you say that you like to practice full contact fighting, then you're called egotistical or violent. I guess the true essence of martial art is only practicing forms, "dead" drills, and throwing out a few Chinese proverbs. But Heaven forbid, you should never practice actual fighting. That's only for savages. So to sum it up, Wing Chun and in fact every martial art is both an art and for fighting. And if you ever come across a sifu or teacher of any art who tells you otherwise, he's either an idiot or a liar.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 12-10-2011, 08:56 PM
EternalSpring's Avatar
EternalSpring EternalSpring is offline
Grand Ultimate
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 235
Quote:
Originally Posted by Grumblegeezer View Post
People have odd ideas about what "art" is. Many people seem to think that the "fancier" and or ornate something is, the more "arty" it is. Yea, art can be very ornate and overdone, or it can be very simple, direct and elegant. Consider the following examples.

First, The Baroque painter Tiepolo's Death of Hyacynth Vey ornate, or what we in the martial arts would term "flashy".

http://www.chinaoilpaintinggallery.c...f-Hyacinth.jpg


Now the mid-20th Century modernist/minimalist Piet Mondrian. He has reduced his entire composition to a few black and white lines, focusing on structure, form and space. His painting is to art what Wing Chun is to martial arts.

http://www.arcadja.com/artmagazine/e...uble-lines.jpg
awesome example, well said!
__________________
Quote:
"There are many different forms of Ving Tsun, but there is one common rule: Ving Tsun can always prove the theory with the hands. Regardless of the source, if it cannot do this, it is not Ving Tsun." -Sigong
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
artist, fighter, theory, wing chun

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:07 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.