Chinwoo-er
11-21-2003, 05:57 PM
Anyone here studies the Bajipiqua system ?
I have personally learnt both seperately and have been trying to merge them for a few years. However, sad to say that I have been unsuccessful. I was wondering if anyone have any thoughts or experieces they would like to share
The surface levels of techniques seems to be ok. It isn't hard to cross between the slack use of the techniques of both system during sparring. However it power generation part that really frustrates me. Rather than complimenting each other, the big swinging & trusting power of piqua seem to get in the way of the twisting & sinking power of baji. I can't seem to flow from one to the other without changing the approach completely. Kinda like changing styles in the middle of a fight. Since I am aiming for a more harmonious (sp?) merge of the two, I want to know how I can inter-flow the power generation without changing the approach.
actually, I don't think I have accounted the problem here very well. It seems to sound that I am trying to use two styles as one while keeping them seperate. Oh well, for those of you who knows what I am talking about, well, you will know what I am talking about. :rolleyes:
I have personally learnt both seperately and have been trying to merge them for a few years. However, sad to say that I have been unsuccessful. I was wondering if anyone have any thoughts or experieces they would like to share
The surface levels of techniques seems to be ok. It isn't hard to cross between the slack use of the techniques of both system during sparring. However it power generation part that really frustrates me. Rather than complimenting each other, the big swinging & trusting power of piqua seem to get in the way of the twisting & sinking power of baji. I can't seem to flow from one to the other without changing the approach completely. Kinda like changing styles in the middle of a fight. Since I am aiming for a more harmonious (sp?) merge of the two, I want to know how I can inter-flow the power generation without changing the approach.
actually, I don't think I have accounted the problem here very well. It seems to sound that I am trying to use two styles as one while keeping them seperate. Oh well, for those of you who knows what I am talking about, well, you will know what I am talking about. :rolleyes: