fa_jing
05-19-2003, 09:34 PM
Hi. I truly believe that there is more than one right way to do WC, but consistency of practice must be maintained and all logical extrapolation of methods must be included for the study of a particular branch.
To draw a parallel, I have read of major differences within the Hsing-Yi style. Where one sub-style uses a push off of the back leg to drive their Pi Chuan or Beng Chuan, another uses a pull from the front leg to drive the same punch. One might suppose that these two methods could be tested side-by-side, and a clear determination made of which is the best. But when you dig a little deeper, you find out that although one method generates more power, it leaves you unbalanced or vulnerable to counterattack (just as an example.) When you compare two sub-styles as a whole, you end up finding out that it is a wash, or it is unclear which if any of the two is better than the other.
It's like a polynomial equation, which has a number of solutions equal to the highest dimension of the equation. Some people think of Wing Chun as a 1st dimensional equation, with only one solution. You may all be familiar with quadratic equations, which have a dimension of 2 and have two solutions. Wing Chun is like a 10-dimensional equation, with 10 solutions (although some may be imaginary LOL )
Small variations can be introduced into the art by truly experienced and learned practicioners and if the martial logic is correct, you will end up with another solutions to the fighting equation. If you deviate too much, it is really like a whole 'nother art. If you don't have the experience/genius, the end result will be an inferior product. However, as we have seen, there are a good many high-quality products known under the Wing Chun umbrella.
To draw a parallel, I have read of major differences within the Hsing-Yi style. Where one sub-style uses a push off of the back leg to drive their Pi Chuan or Beng Chuan, another uses a pull from the front leg to drive the same punch. One might suppose that these two methods could be tested side-by-side, and a clear determination made of which is the best. But when you dig a little deeper, you find out that although one method generates more power, it leaves you unbalanced or vulnerable to counterattack (just as an example.) When you compare two sub-styles as a whole, you end up finding out that it is a wash, or it is unclear which if any of the two is better than the other.
It's like a polynomial equation, which has a number of solutions equal to the highest dimension of the equation. Some people think of Wing Chun as a 1st dimensional equation, with only one solution. You may all be familiar with quadratic equations, which have a dimension of 2 and have two solutions. Wing Chun is like a 10-dimensional equation, with 10 solutions (although some may be imaginary LOL )
Small variations can be introduced into the art by truly experienced and learned practicioners and if the martial logic is correct, you will end up with another solutions to the fighting equation. If you deviate too much, it is really like a whole 'nother art. If you don't have the experience/genius, the end result will be an inferior product. However, as we have seen, there are a good many high-quality products known under the Wing Chun umbrella.