IronFist
05-06-2003, 08:13 PM
Here's a brief summary of my last few months of training:
Chrismas break: (Dec15-Jan15 or so) A month of mass training. Ending weight: 170 or so.
This semester: (Jan 15-May6 or so) I probably lifted weights 5 or 6 times
For three weeks last month I was pretty sick and didn't eat much.
Weight last week: 161
Weight this week: 163
So I pretty much slacked off with the lifting, right? As you may have expected, my bench and squat went DOWN. I haven't deadlifted in like 5 or 6 months at least. But the other day after doing squats I was just messing around with deadlift and what did I do? I PULLED MY OLD PR! Now, it didn't come up quite as easily as last time, but that's not the point.
I have come up with a formula:
Old Deadlift PR = 6 months of not deadlifting + 4 months of slack off lifting + 3 weeks of eating < 1000 calories a day = New Deadlift PR
Does anyone know why?
I've heard that to some extent, bench and squat are reliant upon mass (ie. there comes a point where you won't make significant gains in these two lifts without adding some mass), but deadlift seems to be exempt from this rule. Is it because there's no real negative portion?
I'm serious, does anyone know?
IronFist
Chrismas break: (Dec15-Jan15 or so) A month of mass training. Ending weight: 170 or so.
This semester: (Jan 15-May6 or so) I probably lifted weights 5 or 6 times
For three weeks last month I was pretty sick and didn't eat much.
Weight last week: 161
Weight this week: 163
So I pretty much slacked off with the lifting, right? As you may have expected, my bench and squat went DOWN. I haven't deadlifted in like 5 or 6 months at least. But the other day after doing squats I was just messing around with deadlift and what did I do? I PULLED MY OLD PR! Now, it didn't come up quite as easily as last time, but that's not the point.
I have come up with a formula:
Old Deadlift PR = 6 months of not deadlifting + 4 months of slack off lifting + 3 weeks of eating < 1000 calories a day = New Deadlift PR
Does anyone know why?
I've heard that to some extent, bench and squat are reliant upon mass (ie. there comes a point where you won't make significant gains in these two lifts without adding some mass), but deadlift seems to be exempt from this rule. Is it because there's no real negative portion?
I'm serious, does anyone know?
IronFist